lils (![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} gleemie) wrote,@ 2009-05-07 15:39:00 |
|
Omg pageants are whack
They're pissed that carrie prejean posed "partially nude" when she was 17 I will admit that my first feeling was one of incredible schadenfreude. Of course the girl standing up for het-only marriage -- the same movement that talks about the risks to our children's innocent ears should gay marriage be legalized -- be herself a kid sexually exposing herself. Oh, the delicious new manifestation of the always present irony to these moral majority people. (Saving yourself for marriage by keeping to oral sex and anal another example of this.)
But another irony of all this is that the pageant requires people to actually pose partially nude -- isn't that what a bikini is? So why are some instances of it REQUIRED when others are prohibited?
They're pissed that carrie prejean posed "partially nude" when she was 17 I will admit that my first feeling was one of incredible schadenfreude. Of course the girl standing up for het-only marriage -- the same movement that talks about the risks to our children's innocent ears should gay marriage be legalized -- be herself a kid sexually exposing herself. Oh, the delicious new manifestation of the always present irony to these moral majority people. (Saving yourself for marriage by keeping to oral sex and anal another example of this.)
But another irony of all this is that the pageant requires people to actually pose partially nude -- isn't that what a bikini is? So why are some instances of it REQUIRED when others are prohibited?
